Leslie Heywood, "Immanence, Transcendence, and Immersive Practices: Female
Athletes in U.S. Neoliberalism"
(page 6 of 7)
Given its history, surfing is perhaps the clearest example of the
kind of immersive practice I am attempting to highlight here. Surfing
has its origins in ancient Polynesian culture, where, although
conditions were stratified according to one's social status as nobility
or commoner (with nobility given access to the best waves and best wood
for surfboards), everyone, men and women alike, surfed.[32]
Their technique, however, was very different from the "wave shredding"
that characterizes contemporary styles. As the model for the "soul
surfing" that emerged in California in the mid-to-late 1970s - defined by
surfing historian Matt Warshaw as "the catchall opposition philosophy to
professional surfing"[33] -
early Polynesian surfers are thought
to have ridden deliberately "with waves, flowing in smooth rhythm
with their natural direction."[34]
The other style, recognizably
more Western and originating in Australia as well as regions of
California, takes the opposite approach to waves, "'conquering,'
'attacking' and reducing them to stages on which to perform."[35]
This basic difference in one's philosophical approach to surfing
might also serve as a model for an approach to sport more generally. In
my experiences with the women's cross country team, I experienced both
models, the competitive, "conquering nature and others" model and the
immersive, "going with nature and others" model. In my yoga practice
today I experience the former, while in powerlifting competitions I
experience both.[36]
But because it is much less normative than
the competitive model, it is the former, "immersive" model that is the
better resource for understanding and configuring sport experience
differently so that it might partake of the best aspects of each
model.
As was perhaps indicated by the terms of my analysis above, in my
most recent work, I am moving from an exploration of the status of the
female athlete as such to an analysis of the empirical potentialities of
sport - in particular the sport of surfing - as an immersive practice that
may have effective links to activist practice, particularly in the area
of environmentalism. Recent theoretical debates about the impact of
globalization on contemporary social and cultural transformations have
suggested that the self-fulfillment ethic associated with neoliberalism
necessitates a different approach to environmental activism (and
activism in general) than has been practiced in the past. An empirical
examination of participant experience in surfing may serve as a starting
point for this new approach. Because surfing, from the time of its
Polynesian origins, has been a sport allied with the philosophy of
intrinsic value in nature and at odds with the mechanistic worldview
characteristic of the Western (Californian and Australian) models that
appropriated it, it may currently be described as an embodied lifestyle
practice at once normative and transformative. Surfing, formulated as an
immersive bodily practice, can be a form of engagement with nature that
makes possible "the cultivation of an empowered politics of the
environment,"[37]
and it is this kind of practice, I suggest,
that will most help us to expand the definition of sport to include
practices other than those that are competitive and institutionalized.
This expansion that will undoubtedly lead women who already train on a
daily basis, but in the more immersive model that up to this point has
not necessarily been considered "sport" to consider themselves
athletes.
III. Feminism and Athletes
I have argued that sport can serve as a means of fostering immersive
practices that can reconnect us to a sense of biological time and our
immersion in the natural world - definitely a feminist question. But to
return to the more immediate question of feminism's current relation to
sport: on the positive side of feminist ambivalence is the idea that
sport can function as an empowering site for women that will help to, in
Stimpson's words, "weaken gender as one of life's organizing
principles." Since women's supposed physical and emotional weakness have
long been constructed as an essential difference between men and women
that is located in the biological body, the challenge female athletes by
definition pose to that construction has been instrumental in calling
that presupposition into question. However, despite this undoubtedly
"feminist" challenge to gender assumptions, female athletes and
advocates for women's sports have not always identified as feminist. As
Sabo and Ward have noted in this volume, "implicit feminisms
occur when advocates are guided to one extent or another by what could
be described as feminist values or aims, but they do not publicly
identify as 'feminist' . . . It is fair to say that implicit feminisms
now reign in progressive circles and organizations partly because it has
become politically impractical or functionally irrelevant to overtly
espouse 'feminist' agendas."[38]
What Sabo and Ward call
"implicit feminism" is similar to what, in a number of places, I have
termed "stealth feminism," making the argument that sport is a site
where feminism makes it in through the back door: "Through their work on
women's sports issues, feminists are advancing their ideologies and
causes in a kind of stealth feminism that draws attention to key
feminist issues and goals without provoking the knee-jerk social stigmas
attached to the word 'feminist,' which has been so maligned and
discredited in the popular imagination."[38]
This is one of the
positive reciprocalities between feminism and women's sports, one
particularly important today at a time when feminism often signifies
negatively. Another is the way that sport, understood as an immersive
practice, is much more in alignment with other feminist goals - those
beyond the equal-opportunity goals of classic liberal feminism, which
leave the larger structure intact. Sport understood as immersive
practice may provide a way for everyday individuals to more fully
understand their grounding in biological time, the reality of their own
connection to the ecological world, and the necessity to think about the
environment as part of us rather than something that is "out there."
Such immediate, experientially based understanding can function to
displace the relentless focus on consumerism and make those privileged
enough to live within tech time to think about the ways technology is
both dependent on and disruptive of the ecological world.
|