Leslie Heywood, "Immanence, Transcendence, and Immersive Practices: Female
Athletes in U.S. Neoliberalism"
(page 4 of 7)
Anxiety about female athletes and femininity, evident everywhere in
newspaper and magazine articles, network and cable broadcasts, and
sometimes even advertising, is an anxiety that the "someones" who have
traditionally had to "live in biological time" will renounce that
position. As Mellor points out, when privileged white women take to the
public sphere, someone else - usually non-white women from economically
disadvantaged backgrounds - has to step in to fill the breach. But there
is, furthermore, often an attempt within global media to contain the
ways female athletes signify transcendence and to re-link them visually
with immanence:
Fig. 3: Re-linking Immanence: World Champion Soccer Player Brandi
Chastain in Gear Magazine, 1999.
As scholars have often noted, female athletes often seem all too
willing to participate in this visual linkage between their athletic
bodies and their bodies as unquestionably feminine - immanent.[24]
As a normalizing social discourse, this one seems to have remarkable
structuring power.
This was a powerful discourse that every athlete on my team
internalized. As exemplars of Stimpson's "Atalantas," "honorary men" who
were granted the possibility to "transcend" and occupy the public sphere
in a visible way, becoming part of tech time and free market
"opportunity," on the women's cross country team we came as close to
transcendence as perhaps any women can get. As athletes trained in the
model of sport as zero-sum competition, a model which clearly mirrors
neoliberalism's relentless focus on the bottom line ("winning is the
only thing"), we used our sport as a means to accede to power "defined
and 'realized," as Mellor writes, "by the ability of certain privileged
individuals and groups to (temporarily) free themselves from
embodiedness and embeddedness, from ecological time and biological
time."[25]
Perhaps the clearest way I can express this is
through the images and grounded description from a poem, included in The
Proving Grounds, in which transcendence is a main theme:
For the Women's Cross-Country Team, 1983
Puma shoes that season
In perfect shades of blue and gray:
Deep blue, like angry skies before monsoons
Gray stripes like thick layers
Of silver, our Adidas briefs
So light they hung on our hips
Like feminine hands, remember
Our fantasies of hips, our long bones
Stretched by the squat-jumps
We thrusted before training
Each 10-miler, timed,
Our hips thick and tight
As grapefruits, oranges, lemons, limes,
The smallest and tightest the closest
To bones the best, the lightest to fly
Over dust-soaked fairways,
5-minute miles
Each mile and not feeling it,
Drifting, rising, our arms spiders
Our wrists without flesh
All of us tight in a pack
And breathing one stroke
Taking the switchbacks
Like pumas, like male big-horn sheep:
Anthea, Tracy, Stacy,
Kathy, Liza, Kim,
Do you remember how the Arizona Daily Star
Applauded us, pretty girls, death's heads
Seven perfect wind-up toys
Running toward some reference point
That vanishes where the horizons end -
Do you remember, my teammates,
We got as close to perfection as this.[26]
When "perfection" is defined as "transcendence" - and Mellor's article
makes clear that it is defined this way within the
presuppositions of sped-up, dematerialized, post-industrial, global
capital - people, perhaps especially women who are devalued within the
"Atalanta Syndrome," will attempt to embody that definition of
perfection. We certainly did. "Our hips thick and tight/As grapefruits,
oranges, lemons, limes,/The smallest and tightest the closest/ To bones
the best, the lightest to fly/Over dust-soaked fairways," shows the
elements of tech time, of the desire to transcend the body or at least
diminish it to its most elemental form. "The smallest and tightest the
closest/To bones the best," makes hips, traditionally the signifiers of
flesh and reproductive femininity, become "thick and tight," an image of
shrinkage in which they are first "grapefruits," then "oranges, lemons,
limes." This kind of self-willed diminishment of the body and desire to
rise out of it, to become bones, marks the internalization not just of
media images of skinny models whose images we strove to replicate - as
athletes none of us particularly identified with models - but of something
much deeper: the whole Western philosophy of transcendence and
improvement of the vulnerable biological condition through
technology.
"Drifting, rising, our wrists without flesh," focused on nothing but
our training, striving each day to run the fastest in that particular
practice, eating almost nothing, we were applauded as the dominant
culture's definition of beauty and achievement. We endlessly repeated
the motions we thought would enable us to enact these definitions and
once and for all transcend the stigma that was our gender: "seven
perfect wind-up toys/running toward some reference point/that vanishes
where the horizons end." We never got there of course, each of us
developing some form of long-term injury or illness from overtraining,
each of us learning the hard way that transcendence is an illusion.
"Someone has to live in biological time," and although the
advanced consumer economy under globalization promises transcendence to
those who can afford it, at some point biology, human vulnerability, and
materiality make themselves felt, both on the microcosmic level of the
individual and on the macrocosmic level of the environment, which is
exploited to produce the goods that allow for temporary transcendence in
the "developed" world.
As so many ecologists, sociologists, and even economists have argued,
current patterns of consumption are unsustainable, and we can no longer
afford to ignore the biological and ecological dimensions, as these are
linked to current environmental crises such as diminishing oil and water
supplies, global warming, the destruction of ecosystems, and the
extinction of species. As I will argue, sport defined differently from
the competitive model serves as a mediatory experience between humans
and nature that can increase our ecological awareness and investment in
that ecology - an investment that, in a globalized culture characterized
by the ethic of self-fulfillment, is not easy to foster. As Phil
Macnagten argues, however, "in an individualized society environmental
concerns are likely to be felt most acutely when they impinge on the
body, typically in relation to questions of food and health."[27]
Sport is one means of fostering, in environmental historian Peter
Hay's words, a "pre-rational impulse" that for most people "establishes
identification with the green movement . . . [giving rise to] a deep
consternation at the scale of destruction wrought, in the second half of
the twentieth century, in the name of transcendent human
progression."[28]
This is a role for sport, and for female
athletes, that has been little discussed, and its logic can be most
clearly seen in those dimensions of sport that are defined not solely as
competition, but also as an "immersive practice."
|