Lisa Bloom,
"Polar Fantasies and Aesthetics in the Work of Isaac Julien and Connie Samaras"
(page 4 of 6)
Connie Samaras' Minimalist Aesthetics in V.A.L.I.S.
Though the context of Antarctica is different (it is the only place
in the world without an indigenous population), both Isaac Julien and
Connie Samaras are challenging our perceptions of these regions as well
as our devotion to the older heroic narratives. In the case of Samaras,
who traveled to Antarctica and the South Pole with a National Science
Foundation grant in 2004-5, her work also responds to a number of other
issues specific to Antarctica now, such as: the enormous, continuously
accelerating increase in tourism to Antarctica in the past decade; the
impact of global warming; the soaring prices of raw materials, which
strain agreements governing the status of the polar region;, and the
consequences of the 1959 treaty, which protects the continent for big
science and allows countries like the U.S. to build outposts there. She
is engaging a history of visual representation of Antarctica and the way
this region is still imagined as an empty frozen wasteland of snow and
ice reminiscent of earlier imperial narratives of Arctic and Antarctic
exploration long after the Heroic Age of exploration has passed.[10]
Samaras' V.A.L.I.S. (vast active living intelligence system)
consists of photographs and two videos she took while on an artist's
residency. She approaches Antarctica from a feminist perspective,
deliberately anti-heroic in its focus on what it means to live in such
an inhospitable, and thus anxiety-provoking, built environment. As
Samaras puts it, "because the Antarctica imaginary is strong (perhaps
because so few have traveled there), I attempted to show the ice as a
place, like any place, where the exotic can be disclosed in the
everyday."[11]
Figure 7 Connie Samaras
Buried Fifties Station
digital print
Courtesy of the artist
Her aesthetics of the everyday plays out very differently than does
Isaac Julien's work, which is more about returning us to an earlier
heroic era and the epic. If Julien creates a new aesthetic by
out-subliming the sublime, Samaras goes in the opposite direction and
creates a minimalist aesthetic that matches the minimalism of a hostile
and uncaring environment (see Figure 7). Significantly, her aesthetic is
located in the context of a post-heroic age. Moreover, paralleling these
aesthetic differences is Samaras' emphasis on the contemporary everyday,
while Julien seeks to return to the heroic registers of the early 20th
century to ironically re-invent them. Thus, Samaras' visual project is
framed explicitly as post-heroic and intervenes in the discourse that
confidently explores, maps and visualizes a space, thus turning it into
a place we now claim to consume. In questioning these discourses,
Samaras' post-heroic aesthetic is deliberately at odds with hegemonic
tourism narratives and photographs.
Figure 8 Connie Samaras
Amundsen-Scott Station Phase III (triptych)
digital print
Courtesy of the artist
Her project is founded in another genre altogether—science fiction
and horror, which interest her in part for their critique of technology
and also the way both genres create anxiety to make us question what we
see and know. Her aesthetic approach to Antarctica makes us interrogate
the gap between what we expect to see—touristic views of nowhere that
represent the landscape as pristine and empty—versus her image of
Antarctica as a somewhat flat corporate environment, not quite a rooted
place but more of an eerie transit zone in an extreme environment
(see Figure 8).[12]
This makes her work more in dialogue with the present
discursive context of Antarctica and how these sites are no longer
understood simply as remote spaces that demand to be mapped, but rather
as spaces closely connected to globalized economic and geo-political
forces. Her work on Antarctica attempts to symbolically position
Antarctica in the neo-liberal order, which is fitting as one of the
buildings she photographs is owned by Raytheon, a leading company in the
weapons industry. One of the consequences of neo-liberalism is to
render a certain degree of uniformity to all cities. Obviously that
isn't quite possible in Antarctica because of its extreme climate, but
the built environment suggests a kind of neo-liberal logic emerging as
evidenced by her photograph of the submerged Buckminster Fuller dome
that make it appear as if it has been abandoned or left to deteriorate,
not because it cannot be used meaningfully, but perhaps because it
cannot be used profitably (see Figure 9).
Samaras herself has written on
neo-liberalism and why these images of Antarctica belong in a larger
series that includes photographs of the built environments in Dubai, Abu
Dhabi, Los Angeles, and Las Vegas, amongst other sites.[13]
Figure 9 Connie Samaras
Dome and Tunnels
digital print
Courtesy of the artist
Still, there is a uniqueness to her images that make them particular
to the minimalist aesthetics of the Antarctic landscape. The
otherworldly and corporate aspect of her images has to do in part with
the emptiness of the space and the way she makes many of her structures
look like buildings in the middle of nowhere, unable to make a dent in
the earth. Like the landscape, her interiors are empty and deserted.[14]
Her focus on these alien-looking buildings, combined with her emphasis
on the un-domestic interiors and exteriors, such as her triptych of the
new Amundsen-Scott Station under construction (see Figure 10), have a
strangeness that is intermixed with their ordinariness, creating a
dissonance with, on the one hand, the discourse of Antarctica as an
untouched landscape and, on the other, a scientific utopia of the
future. The ordinariness also has to do with the way buildings such as
the new Amundsen-Scott station, built by a Hawaiian architect and
construction company for Raytheon, looks like the buildings of other
neo-liberal environments with which we are all familiar, and
constructed by similar companies elsewhere in the world.
Figure 10 Connie Samaras
Detail (Panel 2), Amundsen-Scott Station Phase III (triptych)
digital print
Courtesy of the artist
Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
Next page
|