Clancy Ratliff, "Attracting Readers: Sex and Audience in the Blogosphere" (Page 4 of 4)
Conclusion: For Further Discussion
In a post titled "Getting Started With Blogging for the Attractive
Female Blogger," Scott Johnson advises novice female bloggers that
"[g]iven the facts stated above that blogging is a community, that many,
many blog readers are men and that you want to be read, the more
compelling identity you create for yourself, the more likely you are to
be read. And, while this advice may be offensive, from a marketing
perspective, if you actually want to be read, it does make
sense."[24] He then encourages women to post photographs of
themselves on their Weblogs and claims that "sex sells," so if, for
example, a woman wanted to write about public relations, she should opt
for a title like "A Blonde Chick on Public Relations" rather than
"PRBlog." He also includes a screen shot of a man's Weblog, on which the
man has posted a photograph of two topless women with their arms around
each other. In the post, the man explains that he was conducting an
experiment to see if his site traffic went up if he posted photographs
of attractive women. Johnson points out, "Interestingly, you can be male
and even leverage this kind of female imagery." Indeed, the arguments
about sex on Weblogs can be read in quite a cynical fashion: All one has
to do to get readers is to follow the formula of posting sexy
photographs or writing about sex. "Readers" in this case are
heterosexual men, who seem to be the target audience of Weblogs
according to this line of reasoning.
This view influences the discourse on Weblogs in at least two
different ways. First, it serves to confine the women who do want to
explore sexuality on their Weblogs, insofar as their readers cast them
into that role, expect sexual content and suggestive photographs
regularly, and take their posts about other topics less seriously.
Admittedly, any blogger who writes about sex or posts suggestive
photographs on a few occasions is not compelled to do so on a regular
basis. However, due to the constraints of the medium, the bloggers who
include sexuality and who gather an audience this way may feel
compelled to bring readers back to their sites. Women who are genuinely
interested in exploring sexuality on their Weblogs also may find that
their writing is not taken to be sincere, but instead as a ploy to drive
traffic to their sites. Second, when women are discussed on men's
Weblogs in terms of their sexual attractiveness, this discussion acts as
a subtle exclusionary tactic, and women end up being discouraged from
participating in discussions in the comments of those Weblogs. We are
left, unfortunately, with no easy solutions to this rhetorical and
social problem at this time, but it is clear that women's participation
in blogging is circumscribed, and the discourse in the blogosphere is
"tainted," to paraphrase Fraser,[25] due to the ways sex
functions in blogging.
In this essay, I have tried to provide a snapshot of the complex
issues regarding sex and attraction in blogging practices. Many
questions, however, remain unaddressed here. For example, what does this
case reveal about how masculinity is performed? Men are represented
stereotypically here as lechers who are ruled by their libido. Do men
experience social pressure to behave this way online? Do bloggers
sometimes discuss sex and attraction from an ironic stance, in order to
critique the norm? How might this discussion be enriched by examining
queer feminine and masculine rhetorical acts? My purpose here has been
to start a thoughtful conversation about sex and audience in blogging,
and I hope that others build on these questions and more, both on and
off their Weblogs.
This
work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
Endnotes
1. Clancy Ratliff, "*The* Link Portal on Gender in
the Blogosphere," posted to CultureCat: Rhetoric and Feminism, December
21, 2004, http://culturecat.net/node/637
(accessed November 5, 2005). I
had no predetermined set of criteria for how I selected the posts I was
going to analyze for this project. Rather, I kept a running list of the
links to these posts as the bloggers posted them, and when they linked
out to other bloggers who were responding to the "where-are-the-women"
question, or when other bloggers sent trackbacks to their posts, I added
those links to the list as well. In other words, I began with the
feminist Weblogs I read regularly and tracked the conversation network
as widely as possible by looking at posts that the bloggers linked to.
While this group is admittedly homogenous in terms of sexual
orientation, socioeconomic status, and cultural background, I argue that
their remarks about the issues of sex and attraction have much to reveal
about the place of sexuality in blogging communities and its influence
on the discourse in these communities. The complex issues surrounding
sex and attraction are undoubtedly multiracial and present among gay,
lesbian, queer, and transgender bloggers as well as heterosexual
bloggers, but even among nonwhite and GLBT blogging communities, the
discourse takes place in a majority white, heterosexual social context
and does not exist outside of the influence of that context. An
intersectional analysis of sex and attraction as they reveal themselves
in blogging practices is much needed and would be a valuable
contribution to the existing work in computer-mediated communication.
The heteronormativity throughout the discourse will be clear, and I hope
simultaneously to describe this norm at work and critique it. [Return to text]
2. A. S. Bruckman, "Gender Swapping on the
Internet," Proceedings of INET'93 (San Francisco: The Internet
Society, 1993); S. Correll, "The Ethnography of an Electronic Bar: The
Lesbian Café," Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 24 (1995):
270-298; S. Turkle, Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the
Internet (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1995); K. Hall,
"Cyberfeminism," in Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic,
Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives, ed. S. C. Herring, 147-170
(Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1996). [Return to text]
3. Several researchers have compared the blogosphere
to a public sphere. O'Baoill, 2004; T. Roberts-Miller, "Parody Blogging
and the Call of the Real," in Into the Blogosphere: Rhetoric,
Community, and Culture of Weblogs, ed. L. Gurak et al. (University
of Minnesota: 2004),
http://blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/parody_blogging.html
(accessed
August 1, 2005); Ratliff, "*The* Link Portal"; M. Barton, "The Future of
Rational-Critical Debate in Online Public Spheres," Computers and
Composition 22 (2005): 177-190. [Return to text]
4. N. Fraser, "Rethinking the Public Sphere: A
Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy," in
Habermas and the Public Sphere, ed. C. Calhoun, 109-142
(Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992). [Return to text]
5. Ibid., 121. [Return to text]
6. J. Hawkins, "Tweaking Delicate Feminist
Sensibilities in the Blogosphere," posted to Right Wing News, April 22,
2004, http://www.rightwingnews.com/ archives/ week_2004_04_18.PHP#001965
(accessed November 5, 2005). [Return to text]
7. L. McKenna, "Why Don't More Women Have Political
Blogs?," posted to Apt. 11D, March 12, 2004,
http://apartment11d.blogspot.com/
2004_03_01_apartment11d_archive.html#107913704556492034
(accessed November 5, 2005). [Return to text]
8. Cali (girl), comment at "Blogs, Politics, and
Gender," posted to DanielDrezner.com, March 11, 2004,
http://www.danieldrezner.com/archives/001151.html#012336
(accessed
November 5, 2005). [Return to text]
9. Adoherty, comment at "Blogs, Politics, and
Gender," posted to DanielDrezner.com, March 11, 2004,
http://www.danieldrezner.com/archives/001151.html#012336
(accessed
November 5, 2005). [Return to text]
10. SSJPabs, comment at "X Chromosome Blogging,"
posted to Political Animal, June 3, 2004,
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/ archives/individual/2004_06/004066.php#186162
(accessed November 5, 2005). [Return to text]
11. Eukabeuk, "X Chromosome Blogging," posted to
Political Animal, June 4, 2004,
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/ archives/individual/2004_06/004066.php#186329
(accessed November 5, 2005). [Return to text]
12. I recently received the following message via
e-mail: "Okay, so I'm reviewing a manuscript for publication and I'm not
sure if the author is using performativity correctly and I hate
unnecessary critical jargon and when I google I find your blog. Today's
musical question: what's better than a smart Ph.D. candidate? One that's
really cute and hot. Carry on. In Vino Veritas, [name omitted]." I get
e-mails like this every few weeks. [Return to text]
13. J. Hawkins, "There Is No Such Thing as a Glass
Ceiling in the Blogosphere," posted to Right Wing News, April 12, 2004,
http://www.rightwingnews.com/ archives/week_2004_04_11.PHP#001939
(accessed November 5, 2005). [Return to text]
14. K. Blair and P. Takayoshi, "Introduction:
Mapping the Terrain of Feminist Cyberscapes," in Feminist
Cyberscapes: Mapping Gendered Academic Spaces, ed. K. Blair and P.
Takayoshi, 1-18 (Stanford, CT: Ablex: 1999), 7. [Return to text]
15. Ibid., 8. [Return to text]
16. G. E. Hawisher and P. A. Sullivan, "Fleeting
Images: Women Visually Writing the Web," in Passions, Pedagogies, and
21st Century Technologies, ed. G. E. Hawisher and C. L. Selfe,
268-291, (Logan, UT: Utah State University Press, 1999), 287. The term
"cyborg" as it is used here comes from Donna Haraway's 1985 essay, "A
Manifesto for Cyborgs." [Return to text]
17. Reproduced with permission. The content at
Feministe is licensed under a Creative Commons license. Available at
http://www.feministe.us/ blog/archives/2005/02/22/on-women-and-blogging/.
[Return to text]
18. Wonkette is now maintained by two editors, both
of whom are men. [Return to text]
19. M. Catalano, comment at "Attention Whores Get
All the Attention," posted to A Small Victory, April 12, 2004,
http://asmallvictory.net/archives/006461.html (accessed November 5,
2005). [Return to text]
20. Ibid. [Return to text]
21. Fraser, 120. The idea that societal inequities
are reproduced on the Internet is far from a new observation. Much
research has been done about identity online; see S. C. Herring, "Two
Variants of an Electronic Message Schema," in Computer-Mediated
Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives,
ed. S. C. Herring, 81-108 (Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1996); Hall,
"Cyberfeminism"; L. J. Gurak, Persuasion and Privacy in
Cyberspace (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1997) and
Cyberliteracy: Navigating the Internet with Awareness (New Haven,
CT: Yale University Press, 2001); L. Gerrard, ed., "Computers,
Composition, and Gender," special issue, Computers and Composition 16
(1999): 1-207; C. L. Selfe, Technology and Literacy in the
Twenty-First Century: The Importance of Paying Attention
(Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1999). [Return to text]
22. Bitch Ph.D., comment at "I Admit It, There Are
Women," posted to Unfogged, February 22, 2005,
http://www.unfogged.com/ cgi-bin /mt-comments.cgi?entry_id=3039#013552
(accessed November 5, 2005). [Return to text]
23. Bitch Ph.D. [Return to text]
24. S. Johnson, "Getting Started with Blogging for
the Attractive Female Blogger, posted to The FuzzyBlog!, 2002
http://radio.weblogs.com/ 0103807/stories/2002/08/30/ gettingStartedWithBloggingForTheAttractiveFemaleBlogger.html (accessed
July 19, 2006). [Return to text]
25. Fraser, 121. [Return to text]
|