Introduction
Catharine Stimpson may well be my favorite feminist. Certainly she
was my first. As a student in her freshman English seminar section in
1970 I was galvanized and dazzled by her extraordinary intelligence, her
incisive worldview, and her analysis of the modern women's movement,
which had just begun to change our world. She became my adviser, later
my friend. But I consider her above all my inspiration. For someone
called upon to professionally parse the underpinnings of social and
political policy, an early education with Professor Stimpson provided a
complete set of tools: skepticism leavened with idealism, intellect
paired with personal truth, the canonical and the counterintuitive
both.
That last was much in evidence when Kate delivered the first Helen
Pond McIntyre Lecture at Barnard. I would not have been surprised if she
had once again used what she had learned from her position as dean of
the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences at New York University to
debunk the notion of political correctness on campus, a subject she has
written about eloquently in the past. Nor would I have found it
remarkable for her to talk incisively about the evolution of women's
studies in the academy or the women's movement in the world.
But over the years I have learned that Catharine Stimpson is nothing
if not brilliantly unpredictable. And so it was that she brought
together cultural values, classical myth, and personal predilection to
discuss how sports abet and undermine the position of women on the
playing field and in the world, and how the ideals of feminism could
improve and elevate organized athletics. "I am a feminist fan," she
noted.
I cannot say the same: for many years I was one of those feminists
Stimpson describes in her remarks as long having a deep distrust of the
macho ethic of professional sports. I am also the mother of a young
woman with a fearsome right arm who blew out her knee at age 14 on a
killer drive to the basket. Watching my daughter claim her body, her
confidence, and her sense of cooperation and conflict through sports,
that distrustful feminist gave way to one who began to see the possible
synergy of athletic competition and female power. "I hope," Professor
Stimpson told an audience that included some of Barnard's varsity
athletes, "that the presence of women in sports will be a rebuke to
corruption and a murderous desire to win; that it will provide a moral
and psychological leavening; and that it will weaken gender as one of
life's organizing principles." I may still have my doubts, but if anyone
could convince me, it would be Catharine Stimpson. I remain her biggest
fan.
|