Laura Briggs,
"Adoption, Immigration, and Privatization: Transnational Transformations in Family"
(page 3 of 3)
In some ways, it is not surprising that, during this period of
anxiety, there was an explosion of interest from the U.S. in
transnational adoption. Middle-class domestic space had grown
increasingly important, but more women were starting families late and
struggling with fertility. Moral panics about "crack babies" and FAS
left many who, in an earlier generation, might have adopted children
from U.S. foster care leery of potential disabilities. A vision of
unregulated markets was gaining real traction, and, at least
ideologically, the state was in decline. Manufacturing plants began to
move easily and repeatedly to wherever poverty was the greatest,
assuring the lowest wages; Third World workers began to be seen as
interchangeable, and babies entered this world as similarly mobile.
Adoption, like jobs, followed gradients of poverty and civil
disruption. Wars in Korea and Vietnam produced the first big waves of
transnational adoption, and then adoption followed in the wake of
advancing neoliberalism and civil war. In the late '70s and the '80s,
the most significant sending countries, besides South Korea, were
Colombia, Peru, Guatemala, Chile, and Paraguay.[20]
This is a striking
list, as each was run by a right-wing government with close ties to the
U.S., and each was engaged in a dirty war against leftist insurgents
that included massive human rights violations against civilian
populations and used "disappearances"—clandestine arrests, kidnapping,
and murder—as a tactic of terror.[21]
Activism by human rights groups like the Asociación Pro Búsqueda de
Niñas y Niños Desaparecidos in El Salvador and Todos por el Reencuentro
in Guatemala made it increasingly clear that child kidnapping, followed
by adoption within the country or by a U.S. or European family, was also
a tactic of political terror.[22]
Court cases from Argentina to El
Salvador used the disappearance and adoption of children as the
major—sometimes the only—civil war crime that can be
prosecuted.[23] As a
result, organizations of parents of disappeared children and the grown
children themselves have emerged as some of the most important groups in
Latin America's pro-democracy movements that demand legal
accountability for war crimes.
In one place—Guatemala—rates of transnational adoption doubled in the
year after the Peace Accords were signed and increased almost a
hundred-fold within a decade.[24]
Guatemala has been called the country
where neoliberalism has advanced the farthest, at least in part because
anti-Communism was most successful there.[25]
For thirty years, the state
tried to kill every trade unionist, member of an agrarian cooperative,
intellectual, or member of a progressive political party, only to then
turn to genocide of indigenous people, whom they suspected of someday
possibly having progressive sympathies. When the killing was done, the
leaders were pardoned and stayed in power. Those who kidnapped children
and sold them through adoptions during the war continued to oppose the
implementation of international human rights frameworks for adoption.
Despite repeated reforms, each a tacit admission that perhaps all was
not well before, many still regard the Guatemalan adoption system, in
the words of one human rights lawyer, as "a nest of
corruption."[26]
To return, then, to the story with which I began, the conditions
under which middle-class U.S. households decide to hire Latin American
women to do household labor or adopt Guatemalan babies, or that
Guatemalan women decide to migrate or relinquish their children for
adoption, have changed dramatically since 1970. I have tried to describe
the historical, material contexts in which individuals do or do not make
these choices and to characterize some of the things that have made them
more likely in this post-Cold War moment in vigorously neoliberal states
like the U.S. and Guatemala. Privatization has meant the expansion of
"the private" for some and its virtual evisceration for others. We have
understood neoliberalism to be about states and economies, but it is at
least as true to say that it is a story about families.
Endnotes
1. A long version of this article is forthcoming
as "Foreign and Domestic" in Eileen Boris and Rhacel Parreñas,
Intimate Labors: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Care, Domestic,
and Sex Work (Rutgers, 2010). [Return to text]
2. The Guatemalan Truth
Commission report called it genocide; see Comisión para el
Esclarecimiento Histórico. Guatemala: Memoria del Silencio. 12 vols.
Guatemala: Oficina de Servicios para Proyectos las Naciones Unidas,
1991. [Return to text]
3. I first came to understand external adoption as
a kind of alternative to a welfare system after reading Tobias
Hübinette's dissertation. See Tobias Hübinette, "Comforting an Orphaned
Nation: Representations of International Adoption and Adopted Koreans in
Korean Popular Culture" (Stockholm University, 2005). The ideology
battle in Guatemala was particularly stark, and I am not thinking
exclusively of the kinds of positions espoused by the guerilleras,
although that would be clear enough, but also all the labor unions,
agrarian cooperatives, and other grassroots democratic institutions
suppressed through murder by the Guatemalan state. See e.g., Greg
Grandin, The Blood of Guatemala: A History of Race and Nation
(Durham; London: Duke University Press, 2000).
[Return to text]
4. Women's age at first child has been climbing
steadily since 1970, actually increasing almost every year, from 20.1 in
1970 to more than 25 in 2002. It has increased more and faster for white
women than for black women, with women "of Hispanic origin" in the
middle. This would be consistent with it being a strategy for
maintaining middle-class status, as more white women than black or
"Hispanic" women are middle-class, rather than working class. In 2002,
the average age of first birth for all white women was almost
27—getting surprisingly close to ages at which fertility is difficulty.
A. Chandra et al., "Fertility, Family Planning, and
Reproductive Health of U.S. Women: Data from the 2002 National Survey of
Family Growth," in Vital Health Statistics (Hyattsville, MD:
National Center for Health Statistics, 2005). [Return to text]
5. In fact, with respect to the nanny part of the
equation, Hochschild, among others, has pointed this out. See her essay
"Love and Gold," Arlie Russell Hochschild, The Commercialization of
Intimate Life: Notes from Home and Work (Berkeley; London:
University of California Press, 2003). Although I am troubled in this
essay by her assignation of the term "pre-modern" to anyone's late 20th
century childhood—the whole notion seems preposterous at best, a
hallmark of the anthropology of premodern "savages" at worst—I do
appreciate the effort to think through care-work in a transnational
context. Another work that makes this point eloquently is Pierrette
Hondagneu-Sotelo, Doméstica: Immigrant Workers Cleaning and Caring
in the Shadows of Affluence (Berkeley; London: University
of California Press, 2001). [Return to text]
6. Although not, we should note, the "epidemic" of
infertility widely and hysterically reported in the press, that Susan
Faludi comments on in Backlash. Rates of actual infertility are
declining. Impaired fertility is part of normal aging.
A. Chandra et al., p. 2. [Return to text]
7. A number of people have made this point; see
e.g. Pierrette Hondagneu-Sotelo and Ernestine Avila, "I'm Here, but I'm
There: The Meanings of Latina Transnational Motherhood," Gender and
Society 11, no. 5 (1997); Hondagneu-Sotelo, Doméstica : Immigrant
Workers Cleaning and Caring in the Shadows of Affluence. The Bureau
of Labor Statistics in 2006 counted 37.2% Latino or Hispanic "maids or
housekeeping workers," and 19.9% African-American. It recorded no
nannies, but "childcare workers" were 17.3% Latina and 17% Black. Bureau
of Labor Statistics, "Employed Persons by Detailed Occupation, Sex, Race
and Hispanic Origin," (Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics,
2007). (It also found this to be the segment of the employed population
most likely to be poor). Bureau of Labor Statistics, "A Profile of the
Working Poor," (Washington, D.C.: Department of Labor, 2000).
[Return to text]
8. Rhacel Salazar Parreñas, Children of
Global Migration: Transnational Families and Gendered Woes
(Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005). [Return to text]
9. My favorite invocation of these politics is
Barbara Ehrenreich's outraged questions about what happened to them as
she encountered resistance from feminists to her discussion in her
New Yorker article about the humiliating sexual politics of
"maid" work. See Barbara Ehrenreich, Nickel and Dimed: On (Not)
Getting by in America, 1st ed. (New York: Metropolitan Books, 2001).
There is a fabulous new literature on welfare rights; see Annelise
Orleck, Storming Caesars Palace: How Black Mothers Fought Their Own
War on Poverty (Boston: Beacon Press, 2005); Felicia Ann Kornbluh,
The Battle for Welfare Rights: Politics and Poverty in Modern
America (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007).
Peter N. Stearns, Anxious Parents: A History of Modern Childrearing
in America (New York; London: New York University Press, 2003);
Patricia Hill Collins, "Shifting the Center: Race, Class, and Feminist
Theorizing About Motherhood," in Mothering: Ideology, Experience, and
Agency, ed. Evelyn Nakano Glenn, Grace Chang, and Linda Rennie
Forcey (New York: Routledge, 1994); Bonnie Thornton Dill, "Our Mothers'
Grief: Racial-Ethnic Women and the Maintenance of Families," Journal
of Family History 13 (1988); Evelyn Nakano Glenn, "Social
Constructions of Mothering: A Thematic Overview," in Mothering:
Ideology, Experience, and Agency, ed. Evelyn Nakano Glenn, Grace
Chang, and Linda Rennie Forcey (New York: Routledge, 1994). [Return to text]
10. Laura Briggs, "Orphaning the Children of
Welfare: 'Crack Babies,' Race, and Adoption Reform," in Outsiders
Within: Writing on Transracial Adoption, ed. Jane Jeong Trenka,
Julia Chinyere Oparah, and Sun Yung Shin (Cambridge, Mass.: South End
Press, 2006), 2. [Return to text]
11. Michael Dorris, The Broken Cord, 1st
ed. (New York: Harper & Row, 1989). [Return to text]
12. Jane Erikson, "Doctors Mislabel Defects:
Fetal Alcohol Misdiagnosed," Arizona Daily Star, November 27,
1995; HE Hoyme, L Hauck, and DJ Meyer, "Accuracy of Diagnosis of Alcohol
Related Birth Defects by Non-Medical Professionals in a Native American
Population" (paper presented at the David W. Smith Morphogenesis and
Malformations Workshop, Mont Tremblant, Québec, CANADA, 1994). In a
personal communication, Hoyme sent me the paper but told me he never
published the research. [Return to text]
13. Janet Golden, "An Argument That Goes Back to
the Womb": The Demedicalization of Fetal Alcohol Syndrome,
1973-1992," Journal of Social History 33, no. 2 (1999). [Return to text]
14. Charles Trueheart, "Marriage for Better or
Words: The Dorris-and-Erdrich Team, Creating Fiction Without Friction,"
Washington Post, 19 October 1988. [Return to text]
15. Rima D. Apple, Perfect Motherhood: Science
and Childrearing in America (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University
Press, 2006). Argues that Spock is contradictory and that, on the one
hand, he tells mothers to trust themselves, while on the other, he
continues to inculcate the reign of the expert doctor, the one who
really knows. Fair enough. But as she also notes, he is at a minimum a
lot more friendly than the earlier advice books, precisely because he
tells mothers to trust themselves. For the post-Spock period, Apple says
there is a vastly expanded number of experts offering incredibly
heterogeneous advice. Perhaps. But I disagree that there is no
orthodoxy; in my experience, even casual conversations with people over
30 reveals a remarkable unanimity in opinion that those who became
parents in the decades after 1990 are far more anxious than the
generation before. [Return to text]
16. Stearns, Anxious Parents. [Return to text]
17. James D. Sargent, Magda G. Peck, and Michael
Weitzman, "Bicycle-Mounted Child Seats and Injury Risk and Prevention,"
American Journal of Disease of the Child 142 (1986). And
www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/injury/New-fact-sheet03/BicycleHelmetUse.pdf.
[Return to text]
18. Leavitt, Freakonomics. [Return to text]
19. Stearns, Anxious Parents; Steven
Starker, Oracle at the Supermarket (New Brunswick, NJ:
Transaction Publishers, 1989). [Return to text]
20. Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Insititute:
International Adoption Facts (Evan B. Donaldson Adoption
Insititute, 2003 [cited August 30 2007]); available from
http://www.adoptioninstitute.org/FactOverview/international.html.
[Return to text]
21. See e.g., Greg Grandin, The Last Colonial
Massacre : Latin America in the Cold War (Chicago; London:
University of Chicago Press, 2004); Steve Stern, Remembering
Pinochet's Chile: On the Eve of London 1998, The Memory Box of
Pinochet's Chile (Durham: Duke, 2004); Winifred Tate,
"Paramilitaries in Colombia," Brown Journal of World Affairs 8,
no. 1 (2001); Angela Cornell and Kenneth Roberts, "Democracy,
Counter-Insurgency, and Human Rights: The Case of Peru," Human
Rights Quarterly 12 (1990); Alma Guillermoprieto, "Letter from
Lima," New Yorker, October 29 1990; Amnesty International,
"Amnesty International Report 2003: Paraguay," (New York: Amnesty
International, 2003). [Return to text]
22. Personal communication. Jon Cortina,
Pro-Busqueda, July 2005; Pedro Gregoria Santiago, Liga Guatemalteca
para Higiene Mental, August 2007; see also Discovering
Dominga, articles from Proceso, above, unsigned, "Aún
En Busca De Los Niños Que La Guerra Se Llevó,"
SwissInfo, October 6, 2006. [Return to text]
23. The lawyers at la Asociacion Pro Búsqueda los
Niños y Niñas Desaparecidos helped me understand why
this was so critical. Laura Briggs, "Interview with Zaira Navas,
Attorney for Pro Búsqueda," (San Salvador, El Salvador:
2005).The Mexican magazine Proceso has also been covering this
unfolding story. Juan José Dalton, "Ante La Corte Interamericana,"
Proceso, 22 marzo 2005; Juan José Dalton, "Cicatrices No
Cerradas De La Guerra," Proceso, 25 October 2003; Juan José
Dalton, "El Salvador: La Deuda Con Los Niños Deaparecidos,"
Proceso, 8 March 2003; Marcelo Izquierdo, "Abuelas De La Plaza De
Mayo: 25 Años De Búsqueda," Proceso, 25 October
2002. [Return to text]
24. See
http://travel.state.gov/family/adoption/stats/stats_451.html (accessed
January 19, 2006). [Return to text]
25. John T. Way, "The Mayan in the Mall:
Development, Culture and Globalization in Guatemala, 1920-2003" (Yale
University, 2006). [Return to text]
26. Inés Benítez, "Guatemala: Whitewash for
'Adoption Paradise'," Inter Press Service, June 5, 2007. [Return to text]
Page: 1 | 2 | 3
|