Ai-jen Poo,
"Domestic Workers Bill of Rights: A Feminist Approach for a New Economy"
(page 2 of 4)
Most domestic workers are immigrant women of color from the global
South who bear enormous pressure to support families both in the U.S. and
abroad. In a recent survey conducted by DataCenter and Domestic Workers
United, researchers found that 98% of domestic workers are foreign born
and that 59% are the primary income earners for their families. Domestic
work remains one of the few professions available to immigrant women in
major cities. For this reason, it tends to draw in migrants from
poor countries in search of work in our cities' growing informal service
sectors. Many urban immigrant communities rely on the income of domestic
workers for their economic survival.
The pressure to support their families economically is compounded by
domestic workers' responsibilities to provide care for their own
families and homes. The more hours they work, the fewer hours they have
to spend with their own children: making nutritious meals, helping them
with homework, or reading them a bedtime story. If you are working as a
domestic worker in the United States, your own family will often be left
without the care they need and deserve.
Long hours are just the beginning. While some employers treat their
employees with dignity and respect, others use their power to compel
their employees to work as many hours as possible for as little as
possible. The power imbalance between domestic workers and employers is
severe. The employers are commonly of a privileged class, race, and
immigration status with respect to the women they hire to care for their
homes and families. Most workplaces have one lone worker. The workplace
is their employers' private homes—often seen as a "man's castle"—a
place where the government has no business or authority. Advocates
often compare the industry to the "Wild West" because it seems to
function above the law. Employers can utilize sexual and gender-based
harassment to instill fear, as well as exploit workers' immigration
status to establish control in the workplace. Considering the prevalence
of domestic violence, despite generations of organizing and advocacy on
the part of the women's movement, one can imagine what is possible
behind closed doors.
"Maria" worked as a caregiver for a child with a disability. A
Central American woman in her mid-sixties, she came to the United States
to support her family, including her diabetic son whose insulin she
could not afford. In addition to constant care for a child with a
disability, she was responsible for doing the cooking, cleaning, and
ironing for the entire household. Maria worked 18 hours per day, six
days per week for under $3 per hour. She lived in the basement of her
employer's home where a broken sewage system flooded the floor by her
bed. She had to collect cardboard and wood from the street during the
day so she could use them as stepping stones to her bed at night. After
three years working under these terrible conditions, Maria was fired
without notice or severance pay. Working as a domestic worker in the
United States often means working in unhealthy conditions, facing
constant fear of firing, of deportation, of harassment and of abuse.
Domestic work is one our nation's oldest professions, so one should
be able to assume that labor laws and other measures would protect the
basic rights of the workforce. Instead, domestic workers have been
explicitly excluded from labor laws since the New Deal. The exclusion of
domestic workers—most of whom were African American women in the South
at the time those labor laws were passed—is rooted in the legacy of
slavery. It reminds us that Jim Crow is alive and well in the labor
laws. In many states, domestic workers are excluded from the definition
of "employee." Eight decades after the passage of this nation's
foundational labor protections, domestic workers are still struggling to
assert basic worker rights like time off and overtime pay.
Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Next page
|