S&F Online
The Scholar & Feminist Online is a webjournal published three times a year by the Barnard Center for Research on Women
BCRW: The Barnard Center for Research on Women
about contact subscribe archives links
Double Issue: 9.1-9.2: Fall 2010 / Spring 2011
Guest Edited by Rebecca Jordan-Young
Critical Conceptions: Technology, Justice, and the Global Reproductive Market

Karen Winkler, "The Distance Traveled: Reading Leinaweaver and Castañeda on Politics, Privilege, and Race in Transnational Adoption"
(page 4 of 4)

Back from the Catskills, I've enrolled my daughter in a week-long music camp so I'll have time to prep my courses and write. She comes home the first day and tells me, "This 8-year-old girl is adopted from Guatemala, too. We started talking, and I could tell she looked like me, her color was the same but her hair is wavy. She comes from the jungle area." Later in the week, I overhear these two in conversation: "Have you ever been there?" the other girl asks, then proudly declares, "I've been to visit five times!" "I have pictures from when me and my mom were there when I was a baby, but I decided I want to wait to go back until I'm around 11, when I'm old enough to understand everything," my daughter informs her. What my child did not explain is that she has sometimes felt overwhelmed and confused by our conversations about the history of war and suffering in Guatemala, our reading of a biography for children about Rigoberta Menchú,[24] and other kids books about Guatemala, and especially my showing her the (inspiring, I'd naively thought) website for Safe Passage,[25] a child welfare organization that works with children and families living in the garbage dump of Guatemala City.

As Eng notes in the context of First Person Plural, "[t]he contemporary formation of interracial First and Third World families represents a tremendous opportunity ... the disjunctive experiences of the transnational adoptee open upon a painful though potentially productive social and psychic terrain exceeding the privatized boundaries of the family unit."[26] There is no GPS in this place. My daughter is learning Spanish in the dual-language program of our neighborhood public elementary school, where she is in the majority as a child of color, and many of the families are Central American. Do I think this helps her find her way? I hope so. Yet I also worry that my own confusing, painful awareness that my joy as a mother depends on her first mother's loss (she always watched with curious anticipation as my eyes filled each time I got to the part about the birth mother in the requisite adoption storybooks I used to read her), and my efforts to explain Injustice! Racism! Exploitation! Global Capitalism!, have been too much for her tender heart to absorb.

These are deeply personal, challenging issues. Leinaweaver's and Castañeda's papers remind us that these intimate spaces of the family are opportunities for political conversation, where feminists can and should engage with transnational and transracial adoptive families around domestic and global issues of economic justice and human rights. In challenging popular discourses of saving abandoned children and complicating ideas of racial difference, Leinaweaver and Castañeda make visible what I would suggest is the ideological (as well as affective) work done by many adoptive parents to make their "global families" feel "normal." Inasmuch as their work to construct an optimistic, coherent personal adoption narrative may also defend against the anxiety that acknowledging trauma (historical, economic, social, psychic) in transnational adoption might destabilize their family's joy and sense of wholeness, some adoptive parents may resist critiques of transnational and transracial adoption. Yet our relation to the suffering of other mothers—our children's first mothers—and our relation to racism and inequality through our children's lives, can also open onto the possibility of an "ethical multiculturalism" that recognizes in the personal struggle to sustain our own families the need for political struggle to support the rights of women, families, and children around the world.

Endnotes

1. David Eng, "Transnational Adoption and Queer Diasporas," Social Text 21.3 (2003): 1-37. [Return to text]

2. See Leinaweaver. [Return to text]

3. See Leinaweaver. [Return to text]

4. Melanie Braverman, "An Adopted Boy Considers His Origins," New York Times Magazine 3 September 2010. [Return to text]

5. Ibid. [Return to text]

6. Ibid. [Return to text]

7. Reader comments to Melanie Braverman's "An Adopted Boy Considers His Origins." [Return to text]

8. See Laura Briggs, "Adoption, Immigration, and Privatization: Transnational Transformations in Family," S&F Online 7.3 (2009). Briggs asserts that "[A]doption to the U.S. is serving as a privatized welfare system for the ferociously neoliberal Guatemalan state. This is bitterly fitting, given the U.S. role in defeating other visions of the state in Guatemala." [Return to text]

9. See for example: Guatemala Birthfamilies. [Return to text]

10. See Leinaweaver. [Return to text]

11. See, for example, Pat Goudvis' documentary video on Guatemalan adoption, Goodbye Baby (New Day Films, 2005) for discussion by Guatemalan interviewees of some of the conflicts pregnant and childrearing women confront, and intra-country arguments about adoption. See also Henry Frundt, Fair Bananas (Tuscon: University of Arizona Press, 2009) for a discussion of toxic environmental exposures, unfair labor practices, and sexual harassment faced by women banana workers, and union responses to these. [Return to text]

12. See Castañeda. [Return to text]

13. See Castañeda. [Return to text]

14. See Castañeda. [Return to text]

15. See Castañeda. [Return to text]

16. Eng and Han, "Desegregating Love: Transnational Adoption, Racial Reparation, and Racial Transitional Objects," Studies in Gender and Sexuality 7.2: (2006): 147-172, 156. [Return to text]

17. See Castañeda. [Return to text]

18. See Castañeda's endnotes for full references. [Return to text]

19. See Castañeda. [Return to text]

20. Eng, 3. [Return to text]

21. Eng, 1-37. [Return to text]

22. The Official Story, Luis Puenzo, dir. (Historias Cinematograficas, 1985); Casa de los Babys, John Sayles, dir. (IFC Films, 2003); Losing Isaiah, Stephen Gyllenhaal, dir. (Paramount Pictures, 1995). David Eng has also commented on Casa de los Babys in "Political Economics of Passion: Transnational Adoption and Global Woman," Studies in Gender and Sexuality 7.1 (2006): 49-59, 56. [Return to text]

23. See: Jessica Benjamin, The Bonds of Love (New York: Pantheon Books, 1988) for a psychoanalytic discussion of recognition and maternal subjectivity; Eng, 1-37, on the importance to the transnational adoptee of restoring a sense of collective history; and Eng and Han, 157-163, on racial reparation and mourning. [Return to text]

24. Michael Silverstone, Rigoberta Mench—: Defending Human Rights in Guatemala (New York: The Feminist Press, 1999). [Return to text]

25. Safe Passage website. [Return to text]

26. Eng, 32. [Return to text]

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4

© 2011 Barnard Center for Research on Women | S&F Online - Critical Conceptions: Technology, Justice, and the Global Reproductive Market