Faye Ginsburg
and Rayna Rapp,
"The Difference that Disability Makes: Reproductive Justice Through a Wider Lens"
(page 4 of 5)
Mediating Kinship
Imagining inclusion does not take place in a neutral public square
but on local side streets shaped by particular worldviews. Some may be
inhabited by upper middle class professionals in their townhouses in New
York City's fashionable Tribeca neighborhood. Others are the turf of
Orthodox Jewish boys in a Philadelphia suburb who go to Yeshiva and
play baseball wearing yarmulkes. Still others are artists and their
offspring, who live in more bohemian quarters in Fredricksburg,
Virginia. In short, kinship is neither transparent nor uniform; it is
always local and culturally inflected.
The following three examples are drawn from the wide array of media
productions we have encountered—from feature films to D.I.Y. uploads
on YouTube. In this case, they demonstrate narrative approaches taken
by families being represented by different media genres: Oprah Winfrey's
popular mass mediated talk show in which an established fashion designer
confesses her path to knowledge from a driven career woman to an
activist mother helping her daughter diagnosed with LD—and other
children—to have an opportunity for an education; an independent
documentary film with a targeted outreach campaign to religious
communities, using the story of a family helping prepare their son with
Down Syndrome for his Bar Mitzvah; and an experimental first person
digital animation offering an alternative framework for understanding
ADHD across the life course. Together, these films give a vivid sense
of how different each of these life-worlds can be—even under the broad
rubric of middle-class American identity—and how they catalyze
different discursive strategies in order to address the imagined
audiences that are part of the class fraction and cultural world to
which they belong. What we see here is a landscape made possible and
reconfigured by a number of social facts that are like a set of nested
cups: the largest "cup" is the enormous work of social movements and
activists affecting legislative and institutional claims on citizenship
in the U.S., which is the necessary but not sufficient explanation for
how difference starts to be integrated. But our research is built from
the recognition that this is only the starting point. People are born
into cultural systems and families which first shape their primary sense
of belonging and attachment, along with their growing awareness of their
rights and responsibilities in the broader public sphere. We are aware
of a class bias in this sample—suggesting something about who has
access to the means of media production—but our broader data suggest
that "new kinship imaginaries" are widely distributed across class and
cultural lines, mirroring the equal opportunity nature of disability
itself.
In the three clips embedded here, we see how different cultural
repertoires are marshaled to construct new cultural narratives that
accept and even valorize difference, and importantly, rewrite the
cultural script for normative family life around familiar themes in
American culture.
The first example, built around a therapeutic
model of confession, recognition, and a new understanding of self, is
made with Dana Buchman, a highly acclaimed upscale fashion designer who
wrote a popular confessional book, entitled A Special Education,
about what she learned from raising a daughter with serious learning
disabilities. Much of the narrative draws on a discourse common to the
American upper middle class. It is highly medicalized but also includes
New Age elements. The acknowledgement that it is, "Okay to confess and
let your feelings out," is very much a path-to-enlightenment story, but
also in a very American way. Typical of the "cultural innovators" whom
we are studying, Dana takes her newfound and hard won knowledge and
becomes an activist with both the National Center for Learning
Disabilities and an organization that she helped establish called
Promise, which assists in providing neurological evaluations for
underserved (poor) families in the NY area, as proper assessment is a
huge obstacle for many families in their path to finding appropriate
services for their children.[3]
The second example is the opening
sequence from Escape Velocity (2006), an experimental digital
animation that has done well on the festival circuit, made by the media
artist Scott Ligon, coordinator for the digital foundation curriculum at
the Cleveland Institute of Art and author of the book, Digital Art
Revolution (2010).[4]
The film is autobiographical, and focuses on his Attention Deficit
Disorder (ADD) diagnosis, one that he received belatedly, and which he
resituates in a discourse of creativity, of having a brain that is "not
typical." The narrative underscores how ADD is part of his family life;
his wife and children also have ADD diagnoses. Using humor and witty
graphics, Escape Velocity shows how certain everyday things can
become very difficult (like remembering to take the suitcases for a
family trip), but others—like emergencies—are taken in stride.
Additionally, Ligon uses the film's visual and auditory effects to
create a sense for the viewer of what it is like to live with ADD; for
example, he layers the auditory track at one point so that it becomes
difficult to distinguish signal from noise. In Escape Velocity,
art uses science to explore boundaries that challenge everyday
conventions. The characteristics assigned to ADD are portrayed as a
source of creative energy and an unconventional life. Supporting this
point of view, the film opens with a quote from Driven to
Distraction, one of many books written by Dr. Ed Hallowell, a
popular expert on ADD who was among the first to articulate this
alternative view.[5]
Unexpectedly, we also found God in our research. We realize that we
had failed to appreciate the complex differences that shape the ways
that disability is understood in different religious traditions. For
example, in the Jewish community, a Bar Mitzvah—which requires reading
from the sacred Torah scroll—presents a special challenge to dyslexic
children. As one of our informants, a Jewish day school teacher
explained, in addressing the resistance of such places to incorporating
LD kids: "It's in our tradition that education and religion are totally
linked: if you can't read you can't pray." Happily, this is no longer
entirely true as is exuberantly evident in a recent award-winning
documentary, directed by Ilana Trachtman.[6]
The film, Praying
With Lior (2007), tells the story of a boy with Down Syndrome (DS),
Lior Liebling, 13 years old at the time of filming, and his
extraordinary family—and his capacity to pray.
In one of the most
illuminating moments in the film, we
see Lior boarding the bus for his Orthodox day school. His family is
from a much more liberal wing of Judaism, Reconstructionism, but this
yeshiva was able to find ways to incorporate Lior's difference which
included a remarkable capacity for "davening" (prayer) with considerable
success. We then see Lior in his classroom, learning and leading the
"mincha" or the afternoon prayer, thought to be a space for spiritual
contemplation in the day. Appropriately, the next scene offers us some
examples of how his Orthodox classmates use their theological training
to understand Lior, in an extraordinary display of religious creativity
at an age when baseball is usually the top priority. They draw heavily
on the Jewish concept of "kavanah" (Hebrew for intention): spiritual
value has as much to do with the intention of the devotee as with its
"outcome." As one of the boys says, "For Lior, because it is more
difficult to learn to pray, 'it counts double.'". They also draw on the
notion of divine mystery—that one cannot know what God's intention
might be, and that all living beings, including the disabled , are
created in God's image, part of a plan that we cannot know.
Page: 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5
Next page
|