Dee Ann Newell and Ann Adalist-Estrin, "Landmark Policy Recommendations are Unveiled: Recommendations from The National Resource Center on Children and Families of the Incarcerated at Family and Corrections Network"
(page 4 of 4)

Our Conclusions

The process of discussing what helped those impacted by incarceration, what policies and practices created barriers and which policy recommendations would aid service providers in the implementation of promising practices confirmed much of what we, at the National Resource Center have heard and observed over many years. New ideas and perspectives were also brought to light. In every group, the reaction to the CSG Action Plan was one of true excitement and optimism. As one participant said:

"When I first heard of the Bill of Rights for Children of the Incarcerated, I thought, 'yeah, right, who they kidding?' But with this report, it seems much more possible that I have some rights." —17-year-old child of an incarcerated parent

We eagerly await the next steps, moving toward federal legislation, while also recognizing these recommendations have value for state initiatives. Our work has been outlined. We are ready to move forward with the Council of State Governments to indeed improve responses to children of the incarcerated and their families. A total of 79 distinct recommendations are offered. If enacted, they would reduce the harmful effects of incarceration on children of incarcerated parents.

We commend the work of so many in the crafting of these recommendations, maintaining a non-partisan focus, and keeping the children as the centerpiece. We thank the Council of State Governments; please see the recommendations at www.csg.org. The Council of State Governments had the support of the Annie E. Casey Foundation, the Open Society Institute of the Soros Foundation, and the PEW Charitable Trust for this initiative. We appreciate and support this effort and value CSG's willingness to involve the National Resource Center of Family and Corrections in the process of moving toward the development of family strengthening policies and practices that support economic and familial security, and the reduction of stigma and trauma in the lives of these children and their families.

Endnotes

1. Around this time, the Council of State Governments also introduced the Second Chance Act recommendations that spurred federal legislation around re-entry services. [Return to text]

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4